A weekly review of the
latest legislative & regulatory news from Washington.
**Be
sure to "Refresh" this page on your web browser to
view the most recent version of Capitol Update **

THIS
WEEK...
ASME
WORKS TO INFORM CONGRESS ON THE NEED FOR AVIATION/AERONAUTICS RESEARCH
For the past few years, ASME, in collaboration with other engineering
and aerospace organizations, has convened a series of briefings on Capitol
Hill entitled "The Future of Flight," focusing on research in aviation
and aeronautics technologies. The most recent briefing was held on December
10th at the Rayburn House Office Building in Washington, DC.
ASME President Dr. Reginald Vachon provided opening remarks, stating,
"The development of an efficient global air transportation system has
been driven by American engineering, but there is much to discover.
We must inspire a new generation of engineers and scientists to pursue
careers in aerospace and aviation and we must ensure that they have
exciting opportunities in which to apply their skills and talents."
Dr. Prahbat Hajela, past chair of ASME's Aerospace Division and an ASME
fellow with Sen. Conrad Burns, moderated the session.
Michael Hudson, former Vice Chairman of Rolls-Royce North America, represented
the Committee on Aeronautics Research and Technology for Environmental
Compatibility and the Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board of the
National Research Council (NRC). Mr. Hudson 's presentation focused
on two NRC reports, "Securing the Future of U.S. Air Transportation:
A System in Peril," and "For Greener Skies: Reducing Environmental Impacts
of Aviation." Dr. Robert E. Scott, an international economist with the
Economic Policy Institute discussed "Aerospace Employment and Competitive
Outlook."
AEROSPACE
DIVISION STATEMENT HIGHLIGHT OF BRIEFING
The highlight of the briefing was the recent release of an ASME Aerospace
Division position statement entitled, "Persistent and Critical Issues
in the Nation's Aviation and Aeronautics Enterprise." The statement
was the work of a steering committee convened by ASME in May 2003 consisting
of members of key national engineering and aerospace associations.
WORKSHOP
HELD AT WHITE HOUSE CONFERENCE CENTER
To gather information for the white paper, the steering committee organized
a workshop on "Aeronautics and Aviation Technologies," hosted by the
Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) of the Executive Office
of the President.
Leaders from federal agencies, academia, and the private sector participated
in a series of panel discussions on aerodynamics, aircraft propulsion,
avionics and embedded information technology, flight mechanics and control,
information technology in design, and structures and materials. During
the workshop, OSTP asked the steering committee to provide the engineering
community's perspective on technologies that are critical to the long-term
health of the nation's civil and military aviation and aeronautics technology
enterprise.
AEROSPACE
DIVISION POSITION STATEMENT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DISCUSSED AT
CAPITOL HILL BRIEFING
The steering committee Co-Chair, Dr. Earl Dowell, J.A. Jones Professor
at the School of Engineering at Duke University, discussed the committee's
findings and recommendations at the briefing. Dr. Dowell was joined
by his Co-Chair, Dr. Robert Loewy, William R.T. Oakes, Jr. Professor
and Chair at the School of Aerospace Engineering at Georgia Institute
of Technology. Earlier in the day, Dr. Dowell provided the same presentation
to representatives of the National Science and Technology Council Aerospace
Subcommittee of the Office of Science and Technology Policy at the White
House Conference Center.
Dr. Dowell noted that, "Historically, The National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA) has had a pre-eminent combination of talent and
experience in aeronautics research with a network of test facilities
and research aircraft unmatched elsewhere in the world. However, through
a combination of internal and external factors, that capability has
substantially declined to the point that the nation's leadership in
aeronautics is at serious risk."
Dr. Dowell stated that, in its report, the committee focused on technologies
the United States should pursue in aerodynamics, aircraft propulsion,
avionics and embedded information technology, flight mechanics and controls,
information technology in design, and structures and materials. The
committee also addressed crosscutting technologies such as flight software,
composite structures and materials, and autonomous aircraft.
According to the report, "If the United States is to maintain technological
leadership in aeronautics and aviation, it must emphasize the development
of advanced aeronautical technologies in advanced subsonic aircraft,
high-speed supersonic aircraft, and short-haul aircraft."
The Committee noted that the United States' commercial and business
transport airframe manufacturing industries have been under assault
from European and Canadian interests. The U.S. position in the burgeoning
regional jet market currently dominated by Canada and Brazil is virtually
non-existent.
"There are opportunities for new industrial companies and employment
opportunities to emerge based upon advances in a vigorously funded aerospace
research and development program at the national level. There are numerous
and exciting opportunities for major advances in many areas of aeronautical
technology including automated flight vehicles, avionics, propulsion,
quiet aircraft and zero-emissions aircraft," stated the committee.
Technology recommendations outlined in the report include:
- Research
into avionics systems and their applications should be aggressively
pursued because their use is pervasive and is often critical to the
success of advanced aircraft developments.
- Research
and development into Uninhabited Air Vehicles (UAVs) should be given
sustained support addressing issues of reliability, maintainability
and cost, so that the full potential of these promising aircraft can
be realized.
- Federal programs
need to recognize that retaining national leadership in aircraft propulsion
demands a program balanced between near-term needs, driven by market
forces, and longer-term investments required to achieve transformational
national capabilities.
- Fundamental
advances in information technology should be vigorously pursued to
address the increasing complexity of design decisions and the high
costs incurred when inappropriate decisions are taken at early stages
in system design based upon inadequate information and knowledge.
Research on new and more effective prediction methodologies are sorely
needed to meet this challenge.
- Methodologies
that facilitate the development of cost-effective, extraordinarily
reliable software and systems for safety critical operations should
receive the strongest possible support. Not only will such an investment
help to revitalize the nation's aerospace activities, it will also
enhance industrial competitiveness and national security and contribute
to U.S. technology leadership well beyond aeronautics.
- Composite-Structures
research is a critical enabling technology for advanced aeronautical
development, and should be vigorously supported. In particular, new
advances in manufacturing techniques for large-scale composite structures
are required to promote the development of a new generation of aeronautical
vehicles.
- Significant
new aerodynamics research is required in support of innovative and
promising applications ranging from micro UAVs, to Vertical Takeoff
and Landing (VTOL) regional transports to Single Stage to Orbit (SSTO)
launch vehicles and hypersonic missiles.
- Essential
simulation, ground, and flight-testing capabilities must be preserved
and new, more productive capabilities should be developed - including
physical infrastructure and personnel - so that new generations of
advanced aircraft can be designed safely to be competitive in the
world market.
The report
also addresses policy issues and their impact on civil and military
aviation, including the security and quality of life, the science and
engineering workforce, and the preservation of national research assets.
The committee discussed challenges confronting the U.S. aeronautics
enterprise, which includes a sharp decrease in the number of new commercial
and military aircraft programs, a decline in the quality of the research
infrastructure, and erosion in ranks of the workforce needed to ensure
pre-eminence in an increasingly competitive marketplace. According to
the committee, the issues are not unrelated, driven by dramatic reductions
in federal funding for research in aeronautics over the past decade.
The committee noted that legislation introduced in the 108th Congress
"supports many of the recommendations of the Commission on the Future
of the United States Aerospace Industry, and set research and development
objectives for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) which in many cases are
aligned with the objectives established by the committee. We recommend
that they be supported."
In closing, Dr. Dowell stated, "The committee believes that a vigorous
national advanced aeronautical R&D program with strong leadership by
the federal government is essential to the United States: (1) maintaining
a strong national transportation system in support of a world class
economy; (2) sustaining and enhancing its leadership position in global
air transportation; and (3) maintaining homeland security and winning
the war on terrorism."
How will the U.S. aeronautical industry respond to the challenges from
beyond our borders, particularly the European challenge? On this, the
100th Anniversary of Flight, the answer is not at all clear. But, as
stated in the report, "although technological achievement alone will
not guarantee success, success can hardly be achieved unless U.S. aeronautics
meets the technical challenge."
##
"The challenges posed by our rapidly changing world - asymmetric threats,
international competition, environmental awareness, advances in technology
- demand that we, like the Wright brothers 100 years ago, look at the
challenges as opportunities for aerospace and turn them into reality."
The Commission on the Future of the U.S. Aerospace Industry
##
The ASME Aerospace Division position statement entitled, "Persistent
and Critical Issues in the Nation's Aviation and Aeronautics Enterprise"
is available at www.asme.org/gric
The Dec. 10th briefing was cosponsored by: The American Association
of Engineering Societies, The American Helicopter Society, the American
Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, the Institute of Electrical
and Electronics Engineers-USA, NASA Alumni League, Society of Automotive
Engineers, and the NASA Aeronautics Support Team. Presentations from
the briefing are available at http://www.asme.org/gric
Presentations from the ASME May 2003 http://asme.org/gric/AeroWkshop/AviationWkshop_2003.html
Kathryn
Holmes handles aviation/aerospace-related public policy issues for ASME.
She can be reached at holmesk@asme.org
PLEASE
NOTE: THE ARTICLES CONTAINED IN CAPITOL UPDATE ARE NOT POSITIONS OF
ASME OR ANY OF ITS SUB-ENTITIES, UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED AS SUCH.
THIS PUBLICATION IS DESIGNED TO INFORM ASME MEMBERS ABOUT ISSUES OF
CONCERN BEING DEBATED AND DISCUSSED IN THE HALLS OF CONGRESS AND IN
THE FEDERAL AGENCIES.
*****************************
Francis Dietz Government Relations
ASME International
1828 L Street, NW, Suite 906
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: 202.785.7380 Fax: 202.429.9417 Email: dietzf@asme.org
|